Is Land a Safer Investment Than Housing Right Now?
- Greg Powell
- Aug 28
- 3 min read
In today’s shifting real estate market, many buyers and investors in Central Oregon are asking an important question: Should I invest in land instead of a home? With fluctuating mortgage rates, rising insurance costs, and climate risks influencing housing markets, land can feel like a simpler, safer play. But is it? Let’s break it down.
Why Some Investors Are Turning to Land
Unlike a home, raw land doesn’t require maintenance, repairs, or tenant management. For investors wary of market volatility, land offers:
Lower upfront costs (depending on location)
Fewer ongoing expenses (no roof repairs or broken water heaters)
Flexibility for future use (build later, subdivide, or sell to developers)
Scarcity factor – they aren’t making more land in desirable areas like Bend, Redmond, or Sisters
Housing Investment: The Other Side of the Coin
Investing in residential property still has clear advantages:
Immediate cash flow if rented
Tax benefits (mortgage interest deductions, depreciation)
Appreciation plus utility – you can live in it, rent it, or sell it
Easier financing compared to land loans, which often require higher down payments
Risks to Consider
Land Investment Risks
Carrying costs: Property taxes, HOA fees, and possible land maintenance
Limited financing options: Land loans typically require 20–50% down
No cash flow: Until developed or sold, land sits idle
Zoning & restrictions: What you can do with land depends heavily on county rules
Housing Investment Risks
Market cycles: Home values can dip in slower economies
Insurance hikes: Especially in wildfire-prone areas of Central Oregon
Maintenance & management: Homes come with ongoing costs and time commitments
Tenant risk: If rented, vacancy and property damage can cut into returns
Central Oregon Trends: Land vs. Housing
Land demand is growing in areas like Tumalo, La Pine, and Sisters, especially from buyers wanting custom homes or investment parcels.
Housing supply remains tight in Bend and Redmond, meaning homes are still appreciating—just at a slower pace than during the pandemic boom.
Financing gap: Homes are easier to finance, while raw land often requires cash-heavy buyers.
Which Is Safer Right Now?
If you want long-term holding with lower maintenance, land may be the safer bet—especially in Central Oregon where open space is increasingly limited.
If you’re looking for shorter-term returns, rental income, and easier financing, housing remains a stronger play.
The safest strategy may be a blend of both—owning a home for stability and purchasing land as a future-proof investment.
In 2025, both land and housing investments in Central Oregon have merit. Land offers a lower-maintenance, long-term play, while homes deliver faster appreciation and income opportunities. The best choice depends on your timeline, budget, and risk tolerance.
FAQs
Q: Is buying land in Central Oregon a good investment?
Yes, especially in growing areas like Redmond and Sisters. Land is finite, and as the region grows, demand typically increases.
Q: Is land cheaper than buying a house right now?
Usually, yes. Raw land often requires a smaller purchase price but may come with financing hurdles and no immediate return.
Q: Can I get a loan for land?
Yes, but expect stricter terms—higher interest rates and larger down payments than traditional home mortgages.
Q: Which appreciates faster: land or homes?
Homes generally appreciate faster because they offer immediate utility and cash flow potential. Land can appreciate significantly in growth areas but often takes longer.
Q: What’s the biggest risk with land?
Zoning and development restrictions. Always research county regulations before buying.
Comments